Générateur Public

Parcourir les Sondages publics

Filtrer par modèle

Tous les modèles 34 disponibles
GPT 5 Nano 1 crédits
GPT 5.4 Nano 1 crédits
GPT-4o-mini 1 crédits
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1 crédits
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 1 crédits
Gemini 2.5 Pro 1 crédits
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 1 crédits
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 1 crédits
Qwen Plus 1 crédits
Qwen Turbo 1 crédits
Qwen3 Coder Plus 1 crédits
Claude 4.5 Haiku 2 crédits
DeepSeek V4 Flash 2 crédits
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 2 crédits
GPT 4o 2 crédits
GPT 5 Mini 2 crédits
GPT 5.4 Mini 2 crédits
Grok 4 Fast Non-Reasoning 2 crédits
Grok 4.3 2 crédits
Grok Code Fast 1 2 crédits
Qwen Max 2 crédits
Qwen VL Max 2 crédits
DeepSeek V4 Pro 3 crédits
GPT 5 3 crédits
GPT 5.4 3 crédits
GPT o3 mini 3 crédits
GPT o4 mini 3 crédits
Gemini 3.5 Flash 3 crédits
Claude 4.5 Sonnet 4 crédits
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp (Thinking) 4 crédits
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 4 crédits
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 4 crédits
GPT 5 Pro 15 crédits
Claude Opus 4.6 25 crédits
Gérer tous les modèles

Filtrer par langue

Toutes les langues
English (United States)
Spanish (Spain)
French (France)
German (Germany)
Italian (Italy)
Portuguese (Brazil)
Arabic (Generic)
Bengali (India)
Bulgarian (Bulgaria)
Croatian (Croatia)
Czech (Czech Republic)
Danish (Denmark)
Dutch (Belgium)
Dutch (Netherlands)
Estonian (Estonia)
Finnish (Finland)
Greek (Greece)
Gujarati (India)
Hebrew (Israel)
Hindi (India)
Hungarian (Hungary)
Indonesian (Indonesia)
Japanese (Japan)
Kannada (India)
Korean (South Korea)
Latvian (Latvia)
Lithuanian (Lithuania)
Malayalam (India)
Mandarin Chinese (China)
Marathi (India)
Norwegian Bokmål (Norway)
Polish (Poland)
Romanian (Romania)
Russian (Russia)
Serbian (Cyrillic)
Slovak (Slovakia)
Slovenian (Slovenia)
Swahili (Kenya)
Swedish (Sweden)
Tamil (India)
Telugu (India)
Thai (Thailand)
Turkish (Turkey)
Ukrainian (Ukraine)
Urdu (India)
Vietnamese (Vietnam)

Peer Review: Feedback Dynamics

5 questions 5 votes
Explore diverse opinions on the most effective approaches and philosophies behind giving and receiving presentation peer review feedback.
1. When giving peer feedback on a presentation, what aspect should receive the most...
2. Should peer reviews for presentations always be anonymous to encourage more cand...
+ 3 autres questions
Invite : Presentation Peer Review FeedbackGeneral InformationCourse Name:__________________________________________Instructor:__________________________________________Date:__________________________________________ParticipantsPresenter’s Name: __________________________________________________Reviewer’s Name: ___________________________________________________Evaluation RubricRate each category on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = Needs Improvement, 5 = Excellent)CriteriaDescriptionScoreContentThe presentation is well-researched, accurate, and relevant. Includes sufficient supporting details and examples._____ / 5ComprehensionPresenter demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic and effectively answers questions. Key concepts are well explained._____ / 5DeliverySpeaker maintains eye contact, uses clear speech, and is engaging. Visual aids enhance understanding._____ / 5StyleThe overall flow, professionalism, and creative execution of the presentation._____ / 5Total Final Score: ________ / 20Constructive FeedbackPlease provide specific notes on strengths and actionable areas for improvement.What went well:Suggestions for growth:Reviewer’s Signature: ___________________________________
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1 crédit
Afficher